Building a Global Patient Funnel to Predict Uptake for a Gene Therapy Across 15 Countries
Context:
A global
biotech developing an ex-vivo gene therapy for a rare neuromuscular disorder
engaged Thelansis to build a cross-market patient funnel and uptake forecast.
The therapy was approaching regulatory submissions in the US, EU5, and select
APAC markets.
While early
clinical data showed durable functional gains and reduced hospitalization
burden, the commercial challenge was more structural:
- The disease lacked consistent
epidemiology across markets
- Diagnostic rates varied from >70%
in Germany to <25% across several APAC markets, driven by limited NGS
& enzyme testing access
- Payers were already signaling demand
for outcomes linked contracting, making precise patient identification
essential for budget-impact planning
The sponsor
needed a unified, evidence-based model that could:
- Quantify the true “treatable”
population across 15 markets
- Identify points of friction in the
diagnostic and referral pathway
- Predict realistic therapy uptake
under multiple access scenarios
The Challenge:
The client’s
internal epidemiology and forecasting inputs came from different functions
HEOR, medical, and commercial each using separate assumptions:
- Epidemiology ranges differed by up to
3–4x between teams
- No standardized definition of
“eligible patient” existed (genotype, age limits, functional class)
- Several markets lacked structured
data on pre-symptomatic screening, though newborn screening (NBS) pilots
were underway in France, Japan, and Brazil
- Patient leakage points were not
quantified (primary care → neuromuscular specialist → genetic confirmation
→ treatment center readiness)
This
fragmentation made it difficult to justify pricing, anticipate payer review
timelines, or support launch sequencing. We were asked to build a global
patient funnel that moved beyond prevalence numbers and captured real-world
conversion rates at each step of the journey.
Our Approach:
1.
Establishing a Harmonized Epidemiology Framework
We first
created a standardized disease model using:
- Published prevalence & incidence
literature (2015-2024)
- National registries (e.g., TREAT-NMD,
Orphanet)
- Input from 27 KOLs across neurology
and genetic medicine
- Country-specific demographics and
newborn screening penetration
This allowed
us to define a core epidemiology baseline, with transparent assumptions that
could be stress tested.
2. Mapping the
Diagnostic to Treatment Funnel
For each
market, we quantified the probability of a patient progressing through the
following nodes:
- Symptom onset recognition
- Referral to a neuromuscular
specialist
- Genetic confirmation (NGS or enzyme
assay)
- Eligibility confirmation
(phenotype/genotype filters)
- Referral to authorized gene therapy
center
- Center capacity & scheduling
constraints
Real-world
leakage data came from:
- Claims datasets (US)
- Regional NGS testing hubs (EU5,
Japan)
- Hospital system interviews (Korea,
Brazil, Mexico)
Across
markets, the largest gaps were observed at genetic confirmation, especially
where testing is self-pay.
3.
Incorporating Market Access and System Readiness
Because gene
therapy adoption is tightly linked to payer and operational
readiness, the model integrated:
- Expected HTA duration (e.g., NICE’s
typical 9-12 months, HAS 6-9 months)
- Anticipated contracting models
- Capacity constraints at authorized
treatment centers
- Cold-chain & apheresis logistics
availability
Country-specific
access “start dates” were layered onto patient funnel outputs to generate
realistic adoption curves, not theoretical demand.
4. Scenario
Modeling
We ran three
primary scenarios:
- Base case: current diagnostic rates +
expected HTA timelines
- Optimized diagnostic: improvement in
referral & genetic confirmation
- Rapid access: accelerated approvals
(e.g., Japan’s Sakigake-like pathways)
Each scenario
produced a dynamic, country-level patient funnel that aligned clinical, access,
and operational realities.
Key Insights
& Outputs:
1. The Addressable Population Was Overestimated by 40–55%
- Initial internal estimates assumed
nearly all diagnosed patients would be eligible
- After applying real-world eligibility
filters (genotype, comorbidity, functional capacity), the treatable cohort
reduced significantly
- Countries with higher misdiagnosis
rates (e.g., India, Brazil) saw sharper corrections
2. Diagnostic
Friction Varied Drastically Across Regions
- EU5 conversion from diagnosis –
genetic confirmation averaged 78-85%
- APAC conversion ranged 20-45%,
largely due to cost and limited specialist networks
- The US had high testing rates but
higher leakage at the “authorized center access” step due to uneven
geographic distribution
3. System
Readiness Was the Real Bottleneck
- Even in high diagnosis markets,
center capacity is limited year-1 uptake
- Italy and Japan had strong pipelines
for apheresis/infusion centers, whereas Spain, Brazil, and
- Korea required an infrastructure
ramp-up before treating the first patient
4. Uptake
Curves Shifted Materially Under Different Scenarios
Compared to
the base case
- Improved diagnostic pathways
increased year-5 treated patients by 18-30%, depending on the market
- Accelerated access pathways in Japan
and the UK pulled forward peak uptake by 6-9 months
Impact
Delivered:
- The sponsor now had a reliable,
defensible model integrating epidemiology, funnel conversion rates, and
access readiness.
- The funnel framework supported
country-level budget-impact discussions, especially when payers sought
outcomes-based contracts.
- The model highlighted where the
sponsor could expect early volume (US, Germany, Japan) vs. delayed
adoption (Brazil, Korea, Mexico).
- Countries with the steepest funnel
leakage now have targeted tactics—for example:
- Expanding
subsidies for NGS testing
- Building
referral pathways between primary care and neuromuscular centers
- Strengthening
newborn screening advocacy where pilots already exist
- The insights guided site onboarding
timelines, apheresis logistics, and cold-chain requirements per market.
Read more:
Building
a Global Patient Funnel to Predict Uptake for a Gene Therapy Across 15
Countries
Comments
Post a Comment